<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Da ubber PC up and running, Windows Vista pitfalls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls</link>
	<description>Tangy Orangy Content!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:34:06 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls/comment-page-1#comment-122736</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 17:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls/#comment-122736</guid>
		<description>For you should be ok for 64bit, considering you are building your PC all new. Generally 64bit have a slight 5% faster performance than the 32bit. Current devices released after vista launch date should all have 64bit driver support.

But the only thing is don&#039;t expect any of your old devices to work Plug and play lol, its gona be more of a work to do, esp for devices prior windows ME.

I stuck to 32bit as I do not want any possible mess up as I am still using my comp as a production workstation and older software till I upgrade my licenses, so lesser compatibility problems is a must for me now. I don&#039;t think 64bit is within vista&#039;s product lifespan, maybe for windows 7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For you should be ok for 64bit, considering you are building your PC all new. Generally 64bit have a slight 5% faster performance than the 32bit. Current devices released after vista launch date should all have 64bit driver support.</p>
<p>But the only thing is don&#8217;t expect any of your old devices to work Plug and play lol, its gona be more of a work to do, esp for devices prior windows ME.</p>
<p>I stuck to 32bit as I do not want any possible mess up as I am still using my comp as a production workstation and older software till I upgrade my licenses, so lesser compatibility problems is a must for me now. I don&#8217;t think 64bit is within vista&#8217;s product lifespan, maybe for windows 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls/comment-page-1#comment-122735</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls/#comment-122735</guid>
		<description>No, I run my site off a separate rack mount server, so that very much stuff in the datacenters. The comp I built at home is a workstation and for general entertainment/gaming.

yea, for servers I will still steer clear of vista, its not efficient at all... infact currently I do not actually use windows server, only apache and linux. :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I run my site off a separate rack mount server, so that very much stuff in the datacenters. The comp I built at home is a workstation and for general entertainment/gaming.</p>
<p>yea, for servers I will still steer clear of vista, its not efficient at all&#8230; infact currently I do not actually use windows server, only apache and linux. <img src='http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virgil</title>
		<link>http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls/comment-page-1#comment-122733</link>
		<dc:creator>Virgil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 16:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls/#comment-122733</guid>
		<description>Your PC is the same one hosting your blog?

Some of my friends converted from Vista back to Windows Server as they still find the previous kernel more stable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your PC is the same one hosting your blog?</p>
<p>Some of my friends converted from Vista back to Windows Server as they still find the previous kernel more stable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaMerZ</title>
		<link>http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls/comment-page-1#comment-122665</link>
		<dc:creator>GaMerZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls/#comment-122665</guid>
		<description>I am thinking of going with the 64bit version as I don&#039;t have any devices attached to my computer beside my mouse, printer and webcam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thinking of going with the 64bit version as I don&#8217;t have any devices attached to my computer beside my mouse, printer and webcam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls/comment-page-1#comment-122642</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls/#comment-122642</guid>
		<description>I have not used the 64bit version, the problems I faced are with the 32bit version lol! Think it could be worst with the 64-bit version.

For printers should not be a problem as vista have their own drivers inside already. 
I have a feeling that if you want to use old PCI devices (like my old WinTV PCI tuner card in my case), then only 64bit certified drivers can be installed, so take note that if you have any old hardware or add-ons, it most prob will not work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not used the 64bit version, the problems I faced are with the 32bit version lol! Think it could be worst with the 64-bit version.</p>
<p>For printers should not be a problem as vista have their own drivers inside already.<br />
I have a feeling that if you want to use old PCI devices (like my old WinTV PCI tuner card in my case), then only 64bit certified drivers can be installed, so take note that if you have any old hardware or add-ons, it most prob will not work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GaMerZ</title>
		<link>http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls/comment-page-1#comment-122632</link>
		<dc:creator>GaMerZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 01:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shaunchng.com/blogs/2008/04/23/da-ubber-pc-up-and-running-windows-vista-pitfalls/#comment-122632</guid>
		<description>is 64bit version that bad? Because I got not much devices beside my monitor and printer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is 64bit version that bad? Because I got not much devices beside my monitor and printer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

